The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Does oral polio vaccine cause intussusception in infants? Evidence from a sequence of three self-controlled case series studies in the United Kingdom

Andrews, N.; Miller, E.; Waight, P.; Farrington, P.; Crowcroft, N.; Stowe, J. and Taylor, B. (2001). Does oral polio vaccine cause intussusception in infants? Evidence from a sequence of three self-controlled case series studies in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Epidemiology, 17(8) pp. 701–706.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015691619745
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: The use of live oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV) has led to the elimination of poliomyelitis disease in many countries since licensure in 1960. The discovery of an increased risk of an intestinal obstruction known as intussusception following live rotavirus vaccination raised questions about the possibility of a link between live OPV and intussusception. Methods: Three self-controlled caseseries studies were carried out. The first was exploratory and included 218 intussusception episodes from hospital admissions data linked to vaccination records in the Thames region. The two subsequent studies, which used further hospital admissions data and the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) included 107 and 198 episodes respectively and were used to test hypotheses generated in the first study. Results: In the exploratory study risk periods of up to 6 weeks after each dose were examined. The only period with some evidence of an increased risk was the 14–27-day period after the third dose (relative incidence (RI) = 1.97, p = 0.011). The second hospital admissions study and the GPRD study showed no evidence of an increased relative incidence in any putative risk period and did not confirm the increased risk in the 14–27-day period after dose 3 with a combined RI of 1.03. Conclusions: The sequence of studies does not support the hypothesis that OPV causes intussusception. The increased RI in the first study may be explained as a chance finding due to the number of risk periods examined and highlights the need for caution when looking at many risk periods without an a priori hypothesis.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
ISSN: 0393-2990
Keywords: adverse reactions; case series; intussusception; oral polio vaccine
Academic Unit/Department: Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Mathematics and Statistics
Item ID: 22652
Depositing User: Sarah Frain
Date Deposited: 12 Aug 2010 11:13
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2010 21:02
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/22652
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk