Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Rose, Gillian; Degen, Monica and Basdas, Begum
(2010).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00388.x
Abstract
This paper begins by reviewing a range of recent work by geographers conceptualising buildings less as solid objects and more as performances. Buildings, it is argued, are not given but produced, as various materials are held together in specific assemblages by work of various kinds. This has led to a range of studies looking at the diverse sorts of work that make buildings cohere: the political institutions they are embedded in, the material affordances of their non-human components, the discourses surrounding particular kinds of buildings, and, in particular, the experiencing of buildings by their human inhabitants, users and visitors. However, this experiencing has been poorly theorised. Those geographers inspired by actor network approaches to buildings acknowledge human experiences, but in very limited ways; while those geographers inspired more by affect theory evoke the 'feelings' that buildings may provoke but evacuate human subjectivity from their accounts of buildings' performances. Through a case study of two buildings, this paper argues that both approaches are flawed in their uninterest in the human, and proposes that more attention be paid to (at least) three aspects of human feeling: the feel of buildings, feelings in buildings, and feelings about buildings.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 22495
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1475-5661
- Keywords
- Milton Keynes; walk-alongs; architecture; affect; experience; practice
- Academic Unit or School
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
- Research Group
- OpenSpace Research Centre (OSRC)
- Copyright Holders
- © 2010 The Authors
- Depositing User
- Gillian Rose