Sherlock, S.C.; Watts, L.M.; Holdsworth, R.E. and Roberts, D.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764903-160|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Apparently cogenetic mylonite–pseudotachylite assemblages are commonly reported in major fault zones. They represent two very incompatible modes of deformation, and complex formation mechanisms have been proposed to explain this paradox. We report here one such assemblage from Central Norway in which apparently synchronous mylonite and pseudotachylite formation is separated by 100 Ma-mean muscovite Ar/Ar laserprobe spot ages from mylonite, and pseudotachylite matrix, are 406 ± 11 Ma and 290 ± 10 Ma respectively. In preference to a complex cogenetic model we invoke fault reactivation as a viable alternative, and suggest that assumed contemporaneity in such assemblages may be invalid in many cases.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Extra Information:||Some of the symbols may not have transferred correctly into this bibliographic record and/or abstract.|
|Keywords:||Ar-Ar; argon geochronology; pseudotachylite; mylonite; reactivation; Møre–Trøndelag Fault Complex|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Physical Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR)|
|Depositing User:||Sarah Sherlock|
|Date Deposited:||12 Jun 2006|
|Last Modified:||02 Aug 2016 12:52|
|Share this page:|