The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

General-purpose content

Price, Carolyn (2000). General-purpose content. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 14(2) pp. 123–133.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02698590050045719
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In this paper, I consider the objection, raised by Radu Bogdan, that a teleological theory of content is unable to ascribe content to a general-purpose, doxastic system. I begin by giving some attention to the notion of general-purpose representation, and suggest that this notion can best be understood as what I term "interest-independent" representation. I then outline Bogdan's objection in what I take to be its simplest form. I attempt to counter the objection by explaining how a teleologist might ascribe content in a particular case - the case of a perceptual judgement whose content is learned. I reject the idea that the teleologist can appeal to the way in which the subject has used the judgement, or its constituent concepts, in the past, on the grounds that it is possible for the subject to produce judgements and concepts that never help her to satisfy any of her interests. Instead, my account depends on the idea that the process of learning is regulated by a mechanism whose function is to produce a harmony between the information carried by perceptual judgements and the way in which they are used in inference.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2000 Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0269-8595
Academic Unit/Department: Arts > Philosophy
Item ID: 22179
Depositing User: Jean Fone
Date Deposited: 12 Jul 2010 09:20
Last Modified: 23 Oct 2012 13:53
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/22179
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk