Law, John (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. International library of sociology. London: Routledge, pp. 225–254.
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
John Law argues that methods don't just describe social realities but are also involved in creating them. The implications of this argument are highly significant. If this is the case, methods are always political, and it raises the question of what kinds of social realities we want to create.
Most current methods look for clarity and precision. It is usually said that only poor research produces messy findings, and the idea that things in the world might be fluid, elusive, or multiple is unthinkable. Law's startling argument is that this is wrong and it is time for a new approach. Many realities, he says, are vague and ephemeral. If methods want to know and help to shape the world, then they need to reinvent themselves and their politics to deal with mess. That is the challenge. Nothing less will do.
|Item Type:||Authored Book|
|Copyright Holders:||2004 Taylor & Francis Group|
|Keywords:||ANT; actor-network theory; STS; science technology and society; narrative; multiplicity; method; research methods; mess; complexity; non-coherence; performativity|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > History, Religious Studies, Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
|Depositing User:||John Law|
|Date Deposited:||29 Jun 2010 08:44|
|Last Modified:||02 Aug 2016 13:42|
|Share this page:|
Available Versions of this Item
- After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. (deposited 29 Jun 2010 08:44) [Currently Displayed]