The Open UniversitySkip to content

Stylometry and the Defoe canon: a reply to Irving Rothman

Owens, W.R. and Furbank, P. N. (2002). Stylometry and the Defoe canon: a reply to Irving Rothman. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 96(3) pp. 463–465.

Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


In PBSA (94 (2000), pp. 375-98) Irving Rothman attacked P.N. Furbank and W.R. Owens for their work on the Defoe attribution problem, arguing that they had not paid sufficient attention to the stylometric work of Stieg Hargevik (published in 1962). This article is a rejoinder to Rothman, arguing that he has not grasped the fundamental principle that it is not necessary to prove a negative: in other words, where no good reason has ever been put forward for attributing a work to Defoe, that work has no right to a place in the 'canon' of his works. Hargevik's early attempt at a 'stylometric' method of attributing works to Defoe was deeply flawed, and provides no reason for believing that works tested under his method should be regarded as by Defoe.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2002 Bibliographical Society of America
ISSN: 0006-128X
Keywords: English literature; style
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Arts and Cultures
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Research Group: History of Books and Reading (HOBAR)
Item ID: 21596
Depositing User: Jean Fone
Date Deposited: 23 Jul 2010 09:18
Last Modified: 09 Feb 2018 10:46
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU