PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.02.034|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Medvidovic and Edwards provide in their paper (henceforth referred to as the Roadmap) a good survey of the variety of architectural concerns and approaches to mobility. This commentary is intended to complement the Roadmap, discussing additional or alternative concepts, issues and approaches.
The ubiquity of mobile computing devices has enabled communication and access to information and services at an unprecedented scale. Novel application domains and technological advances make the boundaries between mobile, ubiquitous, pervasive and autonomic systems fuzzy. To meet user demands, applications are likely to include facets of several types of systems. We therefore start this commentary with a discussion on what mobility means (Section 2) followed by when does mobility impact architecture (Section 3). Finally, we touch upon two crucial aspects of mobile systems that can benefit from a principled architectural approach: autonomy (Section 4) and privacy (Section 5).
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2010 Elsevier Inc.|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
Centre for Policing Research and Learning (CPRL)
|Depositing User:||Colin Smith|
|Date Deposited:||15 Apr 2010 14:36|
|Last Modified:||12 Nov 2016 12:41|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.