Lillis, T.; Hewings, A.; Vladimirou, D. and Curry, M. J.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00233.x|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
To explore how the global status of English influences knowledge production and circulation, this paper focuses on citations in English-medium national and English-medium international journal articles. Drawing on text, ethnographic, and corpus data from a longitudinal study in four national contexts, we argue that citation practices vary significantly along geolinguistic lines – that is, in terms of who gets cited, where and by whom – and that such differences are highly consequential. We argue that multilingual scholars face particularly difficult decisions which can in part be understood as a tension between the politics of knowledge building and knowledge measuring. We conclude by calling for greater recognition of this tension in discussions about English as an academic lingua franca and in Anglophone centre gatekeeping practices.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd|
|Academic Unit/School:||Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Languages and Applied Linguistics
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Language & Literacies
International Development & Inclusive Innovation
|Depositing User:||Users 9543 not found.|
|Date Deposited:||17 Mar 2010 12:43|
|Last Modified:||09 Feb 2017 13:22|
|Share this page:|