The Open UniversitySkip to content

"Analytics" are no substitute for methodology: a response to Speer and Hutchby

Hammersley, Martyn (2003). "Analytics" are no substitute for methodology: a response to Speer and Hutchby. Sociology, 37(2) pp. 339–351.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


In their article in this issue, Speer and Hutchby argue that qualitative researchers' fears about the reactive effects of audio- or video-recording on the quality of data are misplaced. They claim that these fears stem from a methodological orientation which assumes that in order to study the world we must obtain data that are unaffected by the process of research, that we should observe the social world as if through a one-way mirror. Yet, they point out, most research strategies do affect the data produced. So, the authors argue, qualitative researchers are faced with an intractable dilemma. The solution proposed is to abandon naturalism and to investigate those occasions when people address the fact that their talk is being recorded, using a conversation analytic approach. In response to this, I argue that a concern with reactivity does not imply commitment to any naïve naturalism, and that the approach recommended by the authors does not avoid this methodological problem, unless one is prepared to accept that conversation analysis is the only legitimate form of social research; a proposal for which the authors do not provide a convincing case.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2003 BSA Publications Ltd
ISSN: 0038-0385
Keywords: audio- and video-recording of data; conversation analysis; naturalism / reactivity
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 20512
Depositing User: Users 9543 not found.
Date Deposited: 08 Mar 2010 12:01
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 09:33
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU