The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

"Analytics" are no substitute for methodology: a response to Speer and Hutchby

Hammersley, Martyn (2003). "Analytics" are no substitute for methodology: a response to Speer and Hutchby. Sociology, 37(2) pp. 339–351.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038503037002007
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In their article in this issue, Speer and Hutchby argue that qualitative researchers' fears about the reactive effects of audio- or video-recording on the quality of data are misplaced. They claim that these fears stem from a methodological orientation which assumes that in order to study the world we must obtain data that are unaffected by the process of research, that we should observe the social world as if through a one-way mirror. Yet, they point out, most research strategies do affect the data produced. So, the authors argue, qualitative researchers are faced with an intractable dilemma. The solution proposed is to abandon naturalism and to investigate those occasions when people address the fact that their talk is being recorded, using a conversation analytic approach. In response to this, I argue that a concern with reactivity does not imply commitment to any naïve naturalism, and that the approach recommended by the authors does not avoid this methodological problem, unless one is prepared to accept that conversation analysis is the only legitimate form of social research; a proposal for which the authors do not provide a convincing case.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2003 BSA Publications Ltd
ISSN: 0038-0385
Keywords: audio- and video-recording of data; conversation analysis; naturalism / reactivity
Academic Unit/Department: Education and Language Studies > Childhood, Development and Learning
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 20512
Depositing User: Users 9543 not found.
Date Deposited: 08 Mar 2010 12:01
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2010 20:50
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/20512
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk