The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

A historical and comparative note on the relationship between analytic induction and grounded theorising

Hammersley, Martyn (2010). A historical and comparative note on the relationship between analytic induction and grounded theorising. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2) article no. 4.

URL: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/...
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Analytic induction (AI) and grounded theorising (GT) have long been influential models for conceptualising and guiding particular kinds of qualitative research. However, the relationship between them, in terms of both historical development and conceptual structure, is not always clearly understood. As I show in this article, there are obstacles to understanding these matters. Alfred LINDESMITH, one of the major architects and champions of AI, and Anselm STRAUSS, co-inventor of GT, were students of Herbert BLUMER at the same time, and collaborated on various projects. However, only STRAUSS, with Barney GLASER, provided a detailed comparison between the two approaches. Moreover, even this leaves us with some uncertainties about the precise nature of the similarities and differences, and the reasons for these. The relationship of AI and GT to BLUMER's methodological thinking is even more obscure.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2010 Forum: Qualitative Social Research
ISSN: 1438-5627
Academic Unit/Department: Education and Language Studies > Childhood, Development and Learning
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 20397
Depositing User: Users 9543 not found.
Date Deposited: 05 May 2010 13:59
Last Modified: 25 Oct 2012 09:57
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/20397
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk