This is the latest version of this eprint.
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Eastern Europe's socialist new cities have been seen as embodying 'politicised landscapesï¿½; in other words landscapes created by socialist dictatorships according to their own ideological purposes. The region's socialist new cities were indeed identified as distinctively socialist landscapes, but the processes by which they came to be understood as such by the citizens of socialist states were far more complex than top-down accounts allow. In this article the reactions of both builders and residents of the Hungarian new city of SztÃ¡linvÃ¡ros (Stalin City) to the urban form are examined in order to show how the city came to be seen as a distinctively socialist industrial landscape. Employing an approach based on a dialogue between the methods of historical archaeology and social history this article demonstrates that an examination of popular responses to material culture can reveal much about state socialism in Eastern Europe and its nature.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2005 Society for Historical Archaeology|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > History, Religious Studies, Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
|Depositing User:||Mark Pittaway|
|Date Deposited:||01 Mar 2010 11:22|
|Last Modified:||05 Oct 2016 12:52|
|Share this page:|
Available Versions of this Item
Creating and domesticating Hungary’s socialist industrial landscape; from Dunapentele to Sztálinváros, 1950-1958. (deposited 12 Jun 2006)
- Creating and domesticating Hungary's socialist industrial landscape; from Dunapentele to SztÃ¡linvÃ¡ros, 1950-1958. (deposited 01 Mar 2010 11:22) [Currently Displayed]