The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Changing postgraduate medical education: A commentry from the United Kingdom

Grant, Janet R. (2007). Changing postgraduate medical education: A commentry from the United Kingdom. Medical Journal of Australia, 186(7) S9-S13.

Full text available as:
Full text not publicly available
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
URL: http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/186_07_020407/...
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The current changes in postgraduate training in the United Kingdom are largely driven by government rather than the profession, and are aimed at producing a medical workforce more quickly and more fit-for-purpose in a rapidly changing National Health Service.

Most aspects of the changes are, as yet, untested.

Postgraduate training now consists of a 2-year varied Foundation program, followed by selection to a longer training program within a chosen specialty (often with further selection points to different subspecialties after 2 years).

Assessment systems are a combination of workplace-based assessments and national examinations of knowledge and skill.

The changing, highly managed and partially privatised health service in the UK presents challenges in terms of providing appropriate clinical experience for training.

Postgraduate medical education is now regulated by the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board, which sets standards for all aspects of training, and approves curricula, programs and assessment systems.

The lessons to be learned from the UK are:

When education changes, the actual rationale should be clear.

It is important to understand the difference between political and professional agendas.

Protection of adequate clinical experience is paramount.

Competence models can 'instrumentalise' medical education (ie, deconstruct integrated professional performance, attempt to micromanage, streamline, objectify and rationalise for purposes of cost or time containment or for managerial imperatives).

Standards for medical education should be clear, but not at too specific a level.

If trainees' career structures change, careers advice must also change.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2007 The Medical Journal of Australia
ISSN: 0025-729X
Academic Unit/Department: Health and Social Care > Health and Social Care
Item ID: 20168
Depositing User: Katy Gagg
Date Deposited: 01 Mar 2010 15:25
Last Modified: 09 May 2012 04:20
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/20168
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk