Alani, Harith; Kim, Sanghee; Millard, David E.; Weal, Mark J.; Hall, Wendy; Lewis, Paul H. and Shadbolt, Nigel
(2003).
![[img]](http://oro.open.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (392kB) |
| URL: | http://www.k-cap.org/kcap03/pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca... |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
The Web is probably the largest and richest information repository available today. Search engines are the common access routes to this valuable source. However, the role of these search engines is often limited to the retrieval of lists of potentially relevant documents. The burden of analysing the returned documents and identifying the knowledge of interest is therefore left to the user. The Artequakt system aims to deploy natural language tools to automatically ex-tract and consolidate knowledge from web documents and instantiate a given ontology, which dictates the type and form of knowledge to extract. Artequakt focuses on the domain of artists, and uses the harvested knowledge to gen-erate tailored biographies. This paper describes the latest developments of the system and discusses the problem of knowledge consolidation.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item |
|---|---|
| Copyright Holders: | 2003 The Authors |
| Keywords: | information extraction; ontology instantiation; knowledge consolidation; |
| Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Knowledge Media Institute (KMi) Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) |
| Interdisciplinary Research Centre: | Centre for Research in Computing (CRC) Centre for Policing Research and Learning (CPRL) |
| Item ID: | 20055 |
| Depositing User: | Harith Alani |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Apr 2010 10:59 |
| Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2016 12:46 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/20055 |
| Share this page: |     |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.