Murji, Karim
(2010).
|
|
PDF (Version of Record)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (138Kb) |
| DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: | http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0047279409990687 |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
A decade on from the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, this article examines the contributions of social scientists to the enquiry on two key issues: the meaning of institutional racism and the police response to racial violence. These academic inputs are characterised as instrumental and reflexive forms of knowledge. While social science applied to social policy is most effective in instrumental mode, rather than reflexively, there are various factors – suchas the interpretation of evidence, media debate and the role of prominent individuals – that are more significant
in assessing its consequences. The impact of these factors mean that, although academic work on these issues has been influential, the outcome appears to be that institutional racism has run its course and been disowned or downgraded, while racial violence has become subsumed within the broader category of hate crime. It is argued that the relationship between academic knowledge and policy requires a better grasp of the complexities of applying social science, and that is what this article aims to make a contribution to.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright Holders: | 2010 Cambridge University Press |
| ISSN: | 1469-7823 |
| Academic Unit/Department: | Social Sciences > Sociology |
| Interdisciplinary Research Centre: | Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG) International Centre for Comparative Criminological Research (ICCCR) |
| Item ID: | 19805 |
| Depositing User: | Karim Murji |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2010 12:01 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Oct 2012 13:51 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/19805 |
Actions (login may be required)
| View Item | |
| Public: Report issue / request change |




