Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Murji, Karim
(2010).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279409990687
Abstract
A decade on from the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, this article examines the contributions of social scientists to the enquiry on two key issues: the meaning of institutional racism and the police response to racial violence. These academic inputs are characterised as instrumental and reflexive forms of knowledge. While social science applied to social policy is most effective in instrumental mode, rather than reflexively, there are various factors – suchas the interpretation of evidence, media debate and the role of prominent individuals – that are more significant
in assessing its consequences. The impact of these factors mean that, although academic work on these issues has been influential, the outcome appears to be that institutional racism has run its course and been disowned or downgraded, while racial violence has become subsumed within the broader category of hate crime. It is argued that the relationship between academic knowledge and policy requires a better grasp of the complexities of applying social science, and that is what this article aims to make a contribution to.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 19805
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1469-7823
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Research Group
-
International Centre for Comparative Criminological Research (ICCCR)
Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC) - Copyright Holders
- © 2010 Cambridge University Press
- Depositing User
- Karim Murji