Rogers, Yvonne; Lim, Youn-Kyung; Hazlewood, William R. and Marshall, Paul
Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single users displays?
Human-Computer Interaction, 24(1-2) pp. 79–116.
Full text available as:
Computers designed for single use are often appropriated suboptimally when used by small colocated groups working together. Our research investigates whether shareable interfaces–that are designed for more than one user to inter-act with–can facilitate more equitable participation in colocated group settings compared with single user displays. We present a conceptual framework that
characterizes Shared Information Spaces (SISs) in terms of how they constrain and invite participation using different entry points. An experiment was conducted that compared three different SISs: a physical-digital set-up (least constrained), a multitouch tabletop (medium), and a laptop display (most constrained). Statistical analyses showed there to be little difference in participation levels between the three conditions other than a predictable lack of equity of control over the interface in the laptop condition. However, detailed qualitative analyses revealed more equitable participation took place in the physical-digital condition in terms of verbal utterances over time. Those who spoke the least contributed most to the physical design task. The findings are discussed in relation to the conceptual framework and, more generally, in terms of how to select, design, and combine different display technologies to support collaborative activities.
||2009 Taylor & Francis
||cognitive ergonomics; collaborative Design; ergonomics & human factors; legal, ethical & social Aspects of IT: human computer interaction; ergonomics: human Computer Interaction; Internet & Multimedia; User Interface;
||Mathematics, Computing and Technology
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:
||Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
||20 Jan 2010 10:31
||06 May 2016 05:13
|Share this page:
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.
Actions (login may be required)