Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Sommer, Peter
(2010).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2009.11.006
Abstract
Regulatory trends in forensic science point strongly to the need for exhaustive testing of all findings and tools. At the same time a number of jurisdictions suggest a judicial test for the admissibility of novel scientific evidence. But in fields such as computers and cellphones, the rate of change is faster than the normal times required for peer-reviewed publication. One route to admitting less-than-perfect findings from forensic science is via a re-evaluation of the role of expert evidence and in particular pre-trial meetings between experts.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 19455
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1355-0306
- Academic Unit or School
- Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
- Copyright Holders
- © 2010 Elsevier B.V
- Depositing User
- Peter Sommer