Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Wallis, Jennifer; Burns, Jan and Capdevila, Rose
(2009).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701734545
URL: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a...
Abstract
Q methodology and a Delphi poll combined qualitative and quantitative methods to explore definitions of White and Epston's (1990) narrative approach to therapy among a group of UK practitioners. A Delphi poll was used to generate statements about narrative therapy. The piloting of statements by the Delphi panel identified agreement about theoretical ideas underpinning narrative therapy and certain key practices. A wider group of practitioners ranked the statements in a Q sort and made qualitative comments about their sorting. Quantitative methods (principal components analysis) were used to extract eight accounts of narrative therapy, five of which are qualitatively analysed in this paper. Agreement and differences were identified across a range of issues, including the social construction of narratives, privileging a political stance or narrative techniques and the relationship with other therapies, specifically systemic psychotherapy. Q methodology, combined with the Delphi poll, was a unique and innovative feature of this study.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 19384
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1478-0895
- Keywords
- critical psychology; Delphi poll; narrative therapy; Q methodology; qualitative methods; Q sorting; Q statements; social constructionism; systemic psychotherapy
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Copyright Holders
- © 2009 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
- Depositing User
- Rose Capdevila