|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
The design of assurance cases is hampered by the posit-and-prove approach to software and systems engineering; it has been observed that, traditionally, a product is produced aand then evidence from the development is looked for to build an assurance case. Although post-hoc assured development is possible, it often results in errors being uncovered late—leading to costly redevelopment—or to systems being over-engineered—which also escalates cost. As a consequence, there has been a recent move towards the proactive design of the assurance case. Assurance-driven design sees assurance as a driving force in design. Assurance-driven design is suggestive of how the design process should be shaped for assurance. It is not, however, a prescriptive method; rather it allows an organisation to assess their assurance needs according to their developmental needs, including their attitude to risk, and to adapt their processes accordingly.
We have situated the work within Problem Oriented Engineering, a design framework inspired by Gentzen-style systems, with its root in requirement and software engineering. In the paper we present the main elements of the approach and report on its application in real-world projects.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2009 The Authors|
|Keywords:||dependability; software engineering; assurance case; problem oriented engineering; engineering design|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Computing & Communications
Mathematics, Computing and Technology
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)|
|Depositing User:||Lucia Rapanotti|
|Date Deposited:||04 Dec 2009 11:29|
|Last Modified:||15 Jan 2016 12:10|
|Share this page:|