Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Groza, T.; Handschuh, S.; Clark, T.; Buckingham Shum, S. and de Waard, A.
(2009).
URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-523
Abstract
With the advancement of technology and the wide adoption of ontologies as knowledge representation formats, in the last decade, a handful of models were proposed for the externalization of the rhetoric and argumentation captured within scientific publications. Conceptually, most of these models share a similar representation form of the scientific publication, i.e. as a series of interconnected elementary knowledge items. The main differences are given by the terminology used, the types of rhetorical and/or argumentation relations connecting the knowledge items and the foundational theories supporting these relations. This paper analyzes the state of the art and provides a concise comparative overview of the five most prominent discourse representation models, with the goal of sketching an unified model for discourse representation.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 18565
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- ISSN
- 1613-0073
- Keywords
- scientific discourse; semantic web; pragmatic web; science publishing; argumentation tools;
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Knowledge Media Institute (KMi)
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - Research Group
- Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
- Copyright Holders
- © 2009 The Authors
- Depositing User
- Simon Buckingham Shum