Copy the page URI to the clipboard
de Waard, A.; Buckingham Shum, S.; Carusi, A.; Park, J.; Samwald, M. and Sándor, Á.
(2009).
URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-523
Abstract
Biological knowledge is increasingly represented as a collection of (entity-relationship-entity) triplets. These are queried, mined, appended to papers, and published. However, this representation ignores the argumentation contained within a paper and the relationships between hypotheses, claims and evidence put forth in the article. In this paper, we propose an alternate view of the research article as a network of 'hypotheses and evidence'. Our knowledge representation focuses on scientific discourse as a rhetorical activity, which leads to a different direction in the development of tools and processes for modeling this discourse. We propose to extract knowledge from the article to allow the construction of a system where a specific scientific claim is connected, through trails of meaningful relationships, to experimental evidence. We discuss some current efforts and future plans in this area.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 18563
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- ISSN
- 1613-0073
- Keywords
- hypothesis identification; discourse analysis; pragmatic web; science publishing; argumentation tools; author intent;
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Knowledge Media Institute (KMi)
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - Research Group
- Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
- Copyright Holders
- © 2009 The Authors
- Depositing User
- Simon Buckingham Shum