The Open UniversitySkip to content

Argument reconceived?

Coffin, Caroline and O'Halloran, Kieran A. (2009). Argument reconceived? Educational Review, 61(3) pp. 301–313.

Full text available as:
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (142Kb)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


Just over 10 years ago, Educational Review published an article 'Reconceiving argument' by Richard Andrews. In the article, Andrews traced some of the changes in the conception of argument that had taken place within educational contexts (primarily within the UK) over the previous few years. An important aim of the authors' article is to consider whether there is any evidence that the (re)conceptualization of argument discussed in Andrews' article has permeated educational theory and practice in the last 10 years. Specifically they will consider his invocation of new metaphors to conceive of the argumentation process as more akin to a dialogic exchange in contrast to adversarial combat. They question whether such a framing diminishes the value of conflict and confrontation in the argumentation process.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2009 Educational Review
ISSN: 1465-3397
Keywords: argument; education; dialogic exchange; collaborative argumentation; conflict; confrontation; discourse; new technologies
Academic Unit/Department: Education and Language Studies > Centre for Language and Communication
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 18460
Depositing User: Caroline Coffin
Date Deposited: 13 Oct 2009 14:48
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2012 19:01
Share this page:


Scopus Citations

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340