Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Kanaan, M.N. and Farrington, C.P.
(2005).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268805004528
Abstract
Mathematical modelling is an established tool for planning and monitoring vaccination programmes. However, the matrices describing contact rates are based on subjective choices, which have a large impact on results. This paper reviews published models and obtains prior model probabilities based on publication frequency and expert opinion. Using serological survey data on rubella and mumps, Bayesian methods of model choice are applied to select the most plausible models. Estimates of the basic reproduction number R, are derived, taking into account model uncertainty and individual heterogeneity in contact rates. Twenty-two models are documented, for which publication frequency and expert opinion are negatively correlated. Using the expert prior with individual heterogeneity, R-0 = 6.1 [95% credible region (CR) 4.3-9.2] for rubella and R-0= 19-3 (95% CR 4.0-31.5) for mumps. The posterior modes are insensitive to the prior for rubella but not for mumps. Overall, assortative models with individual heterogeneity are recommended.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 18158
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 0950-2688
- Project Funding Details
-
Funded Project Name Project ID Funding Body Not Set Not Set Wellcome Trust [grant number 061830] - Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Mathematics and Statistics
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - Copyright Holders
- © 2005 Cambridge University Press
- Depositing User
- Colin Smith