Clarke, John; Newman, Janet and Westmarland, Louise
PDF (Not Set)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
About the book: Postmodern theories heralded the "death of the subject", and thereby deeply contested our intuition that we are free and willing selves. In recent times, the (free) will has come under attack yet again. Findings from the neuro- and cognitive sciences claim the concept of will to be scientifically untenable, specifying that it is our brain rather than our 'self' which decides what we want to do. In spite of these challenges however, the willing self has come to take centre stage in our society: juridical and moral practices ascribing guilt, or the organization of everyday life attributing responsibilities, for instance, can hardly be understood without taking recourse to the willing subject.
In this vein, the authors address topics such as the genealogy of the concept of willing selves, the discourse on agency in neuroscience and sociology, the political debate on volition within neoliberal and neoconservative regimes, approaches toward novel forms of relational responsibility as well as moral evaluations in conceptualizing autonomy.
|Item Type:||Book Chapter|
|Copyright Holders:||2009 Macmillan Publishers|
|Extra Information:||This extract is taken from the author's original manuscript and has not been edited. The definitive version of this piece may be found in On Willing Selves: Neoliberal Politics and the Challenge of Neuroscience edited by Maasen, Sabine and Sutter, Barbara which can be purchased from www.palgrave.com.|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Social Sciences > Social Policy and Criminology|
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG)
International Centre for Comparative Criminological Research (ICCCR)
|Depositing User:||John Clarke|
|Date Deposited:||03 Sep 2009 09:56|
|Last Modified:||05 Dec 2010 05:37|
|Share this page:|