This is the latest version of this eprint.
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
This paper will examine the use of quantitative and qualitative methods a complementary research methods. It asks the fundamental question whether these two approaches can be used jointly in a principled manner. The pressure in educational research has been towards using the two methods alongside each other. In applied research the use of the two approaches in the same project is accepted yet we still find serious objections raised to such work when it is presented in a more formal context. Evaluation studies are often multi-method in their approaches whilst doctoral students will still find examiners balking at the use of mixed methods in doctoral research. This paper tries to both investigate the source and nature of this division and to illustrate practical ways in which the division may be overcome.
|Item Type:||Book Chapter|
|Academic Unit/School:||Learning Teaching and Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning Teaching and Innovation (LTI)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)|
|Depositing User:||Chris Jones|
|Date Deposited:||20 Aug 2009 11:28|
|Last Modified:||07 Feb 2017 18:28|
|Share this page:|
Available Versions of this Item
Quantitative and qualitative research: conflicting paradigms or perfect partners? (deposited 15 Jul 2009 08:44)
- Quantitative and qualitative research: conflicting paradigms or perfect partners? (deposited 20 Aug 2009 11:28) [Currently Displayed]
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.