The Open UniversitySkip to content

Children as researchers: what can we learn from them about the impact of poverty on literacy opportunities?

Kellett, Mary (2009). Children as researchers: what can we learn from them about the impact of poverty on literacy opportunities? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(4) pp. 395–408.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


This article challenges some of the assumptions about our understanding of and approaches to literacy. Crucially, it provides evidence hitherto missing from the body of research knowledge: children’s own perspectives on literacy opportunities accessed by children themselves. Reading proficiency is pivotal in education, providing a platform on which much other curricular endeavour is built (e.g. Guthrie and Wigfield, 2000). Two groups of six children (aged 11 years) in two UK primary schools – one in an area of socio-economic advantage and one in an area of socio-economic disadvantage - underwent a programme of research training and were supported to undertake their own research projects about aspects of literacy that interested or concerned them. The extent to which poverty could be identified as an inhibiting factor was carried out as an adult abstraction from the children’s studies (with the children’s informed consent). This was done to avoid any possible poverty self-labelling or stigmatization being occasioned to children through association. Findings revealed that children from affluent backgrounds exuded literacy confidence derived from a variety of opportunities: routine support for homework, parental oracy role models, favourable environments for reading and writing, absence of distractions and opportunities to talk about literacy. By contrast children from poorer backgrounds had few, if any, of these opportunities. For them homework clubs were a life line. An important self-development strategy uncovered in the children’s reports was the need to ‘practise private confidence’ before developing ‘public confidence’. Children identified reading aloud and writing as activities requiring ‘public confidence’ and activities which needed a lot of ‘private’ practice. A striking characteristic of children from affluent backgrounds was how easy it was for them to access opportunities for ‘private confidence’ building whereas children from low-income backgrounds had the opposite experience. Implications for policy and practice are discussed in the light of these findings.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2009 Routledge/Taylor and Francis
ISSN: 1360-3116
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Not SetNot SetJoseph Rowntree Foundation
Extra Information: Special Issue: Poverty and Education
Keywords: Poverty; Children as researchers; Literacy;
Academic Unit/School: Other Departments > Vice-Chancellor's Office
Other Departments
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Childhood Youth and Sport Group (CYSG)
Item ID: 17852
Depositing User: Mary Kellett
Date Deposited: 31 Jul 2009 11:14
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 09:27
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU