Shorrocks, Bryan; Rosewell, Jonathan and Edwards, Kathy
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.2307/5027|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
(1) We test the assumption of the aggregation model of coexistence on a divided and ephemeral resource that there is no association between species.
(2) We test associations by presence and absence from patches using 2 x 2 contingency tables and the chi-squared statistic. As a convenient index of association we use the four-point correlation coefficient phi = sqrt(chi-squared/N) where N is the number of observations (patches) in the corresponding contingency table and chi-squared is the uncorrected statistic.
(3) The data, from laboratory experiments, field experiments and field collections shows no evidence of association between species pairs. Out of 157 comparisons, only eight show significant associations at the 5% level.
(4) We incorporate phi into the original aggregation model for two-species competition and into the guild-size extension and examine its influence. Probability refuges and resource refuges are therefore brought together within one conceptual framework.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||probability refuge; resource refuge; interspecific competition; aggregation; population dynamics; patchy environment;|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)|
|Depositing User:||Jonathan Rosewell|
|Date Deposited:||02 Jul 2009 15:42|
|Last Modified:||02 Aug 2016 13:29|
|Share this page:|