The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Soft systems methodology: other voices

Holwell, Sue (2000). Soft systems methodology: other voices. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13(6) pp. 773–797.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (150Kb)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026479529130
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This issue of Systemic Practice and Action Research, celebrating the work of Peter Checkland, in the particular nature and development of soft systems methodology (SSM), would not have happened unless the work was seen by others as being important. No significant contribution to thinking happens without a secondary literature developing. Not surprisingly, many commentaries have accompanied the ongoing development of SSM. Some of these are insightful, some full of errors, and some include both insight and absurdity. Checkland (1999, p. A42) opines, in the recently published 30-year retrospective, that "SSM has been ill-served by its commentators." Scrutiny of the secondary literature on SSM provides support for this view and also identifies some general characteristics and trends that are important to the development of SSM and, incidentally, reinforces some existing conclusions.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 1094-429X
Extra Information: The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
Keywords: Soft systems methodology; Peter Checkland;
Academic Unit/Department: Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Computing & Communications
Item ID: 172
Depositing User: Users 12 not found.
Date Deposited: 05 Sep 2006
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2010 05:19
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/172
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk