The Open UniversitySkip to content

Soft systems methodology: other voices

Holwell, Sue (2000). Soft systems methodology: other voices. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13(6) pp. 773–797.

Full text available as:
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (150Kb)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


This issue of Systemic Practice and Action Research, celebrating the work of Peter Checkland, in the particular nature and development of soft systems methodology (SSM), would not have happened unless the work was seen by others as being important. No significant contribution to thinking happens without a secondary literature developing. Not surprisingly, many commentaries have accompanied the ongoing development of SSM. Some of these are insightful, some full of errors, and some include both insight and absurdity. Checkland (1999, p. A42) opines, in the recently published 30-year retrospective, that "SSM has been ill-served by its commentators." Scrutiny of the secondary literature on SSM provides support for this view and also identifies some general characteristics and trends that are important to the development of SSM and, incidentally, reinforces some existing conclusions.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 1094-429X
Extra Information: The original publication is available at
Keywords: Soft systems methodology; Peter Checkland;
Academic Unit/Department: Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Computing & Communications
Item ID: 172
Depositing User: Users 12 not found.
Date Deposited: 05 Sep 2006
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2010 05:19
Share this page:


Scopus Citations

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340