The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Challenging relativism: The problem of assessment criteria

Hammersley, Martyn (2009). Challenging relativism: The problem of assessment criteria. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(1) pp. 3–29.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800408325325
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article raises serious questions about the relativist approach to assessing qualitative research that has been championed by John K. Smith and various colleagues. They reject not just empiricism but also what they refer to as "neorealism." Against both these positions, they advance an antirealist, anti-ontological argument to the effect that we should not assume the reality of social phenomena as existing independently of our knowledge claims about them; insist that assessing the value of research findings is always a practical matter, rather than an issue of method; and claim that we must abandon epistemic in favor of moral criteria in assessing social research. On the basis of detailed scrutiny of their arguments, it is shown that neither the critique of neorealism they present nor the alternative approach they recommend is coherent or convincing.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2009 Sage Publications
ISSN: 1552-7565
Academic Unit/Department: Education and Language Studies > Childhood, Development and Learning
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 17159
Depositing User: Wendy Hunt
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2009 09:17
Last Modified: 25 Oct 2012 09:57
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/17159
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk