The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

The issue of quality in qualitative research

Hammersley, Martyn (2007). The issue of quality in qualitative research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30(3) pp. 287–306.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437270701614782
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article addresses the perennial issue of the criteria by which qualitative research should be evaluated. At the present time, there is a sharp conflict between demands for explicit criteria, for example in order to serve systematic reviewing and evidence-based practice, and arguments on the part of some qualitative researchers that such criteria are neither necessary nor desirable. At issue here, in part, is what the term 'criterion' means, and what role criteria could play in the context of qualitative enquiry. Equally important, though, is the question of whether a single set of criteria is possible across qualitative research, given the fundamental areas of disagreement within it. These reflect divergent paradigms framed by value assumptions about what is and is not worth investigation. In addition, there are differences in methodological orientation: over what counts as rigorous enquiry, realism versus constructionism, and whether the goal of research is to produce knowledge or to serve other goals.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 1743-7288
Academic Unit/Department: Education and Language Studies > Childhood, Development and Learning
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 17155
Depositing User: Wendy Hunt
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2009 09:26
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2010 20:32
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/17155
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk