The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Countering the 'new orthodoxy' in educational research: a response to Phil Hodkinson

Hammersley, Martyn (2005). Countering the 'new orthodoxy' in educational research: a response to Phil Hodkinson. British Educational Research Journal, 31(2) pp. 139–155.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0141192052000340189
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In a previous article, Phil Hodkinson argued that there are currently attempts to impose a methodological orthodoxy on educational research, one that is empiricist in character and privileges quantitative method. While agreeing with much of what he says, I take issue with key elements of his argument. I suggest that he presents too rosy a picture of the existing state of educational research, question his apparent advocacy of a laissez-faire approach to its governance, and argue that he underplays the significant role that methodological rules can play in shaping the practice of research in desirable ways. I suggest that his approach is likely to reinforce paradigmatic fragmentation in the research community, and that this weakens any attempt to resist the internal and external pressures that currently threaten to damage or destroy educational research in the UK, and elsewhere.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 1469-3518
Academic Unit/Department: Education and Language Studies > Childhood, Development and Learning
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 17153
Depositing User: Wendy Hunt
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2009 09:54
Last Modified: 28 Jan 2014 13:49
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/17153
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk