The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Unrest at Campi Flegrei: A contribution to the magmatic versus hydrothermal debate from inverse and finite element modeling

Gottsmann, J.; Folch, A. and Rymer, H. (2006). Unrest at Campi Flegrei: A contribution to the magmatic versus hydrothermal debate from inverse and finite element modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B7) B07203.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003745
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

[ 1] We present results from the modeling of ground deformation and microgravimetric data recorded at Campi Flegrei in order to assess the causative phenomena of caldera unrest between 1981 and 2001. We find that residual gravity changes during ground uplift ( 1982 - 1984) are indicative of mass changes in a hybrid of magmatic and hydrothermal sources. During deflation between 1985 and 2001, the inversion of gravity residuals for a single source does not provide convincing results. We then performed the joint inversion of gravity and deformation data for multiple spherical sources and refined source parameters by finite element modeling in order to mitigate against limitations of the analytical solutions. The data recorded during inflation and rapid deflation may be best explained by mass and pressure changes in a deep magmatic source at about 5 km depth and a shallow ( 2 km deep) hydrothermal source. Both sources contribute equally to the gravity changes observed between 1982 and 1984; the contemporary uplift appears to be mainly caused by the shallow source. The subsequent deflation is dominated by a pressure decrease in the hydrothermal source; the magmatic source contributes chiefly to the observed gravity changes. Pressure and density variations within multiple shallow-seated hydrothermal sources provide acceptable fits to the deflation and accompanying gravity changes recorded since 1988. These shallow level dynamics also appear to trigger spatially and temporarily random short-term reversals of the overall mode of ground subsidence since 1985. Our analysis does not support the idea of magmatic contributions to these short-lived periods of inflation.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 0148-0227
Academic Unit/Department: Science > Environment, Earth and Ecosystems
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR)
Item ID: 16023
Depositing User: Users 8955 not found.
Date Deposited: 12 May 2009 10:51
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2010 20:27
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/16023
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk