Jones, Chris and Henderson, D. A.
PDF (Not Set)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.03.019|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Methods for improving the basic kernel density estimator include variable locations, variable bandwidths and variable weights. Typically these methods are implemented separately and via pilot estimation of variation functions derived from asymptotic considerations. The starting point here is a simple maximum likelihood procedure which allows (in its greatest generality) variation of all these quantities at once, bypassing asymptotics and explicit pilot estimation. One special case of this approach is the density estimator associated with nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation (NPMLE) in a normal location mixture model. Another, closely associated with the NPMLE, is a kernel convolution sieve estimator proposed in 1982 but little used in practice to date. Simple algorithms are utilised, a simulation study is reported on, a method for bandwidth selection is investigated and an illustrative example is given. The simulations and other considerations suggest that the kernel convolution sieve provides an especially promising framework for further practical utilisation and development. And the method has a further advantage: it automatically reduces, where appropriate, to a few-component mixture model which indicates and initialises parametric mixture modelling of the data.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2009 Elsevier B.V.|
|Keywords:||mixture modelling; normal mixtures; NPMLE; variable location|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Mathematics and Statistics
Mathematics, Computing and Technology
|Depositing User:||Colin Smith|
|Date Deposited:||17 Apr 2009 15:15|
|Last Modified:||24 Feb 2016 03:00|
|Share this page:|
► Automated document suggestions from open access sources
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.