Brasher, Andrew; Conole, Gráinne; Cross, Simon; Weller, Martin; Clark, Paul and White, Juliette
(2008).
![]()
|
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (682kB) |
URL: | http://lams2008.lamsfoundation.org/proceedings.htm |
---|---|
Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
Developers and teachers go through a complex decision making process when designing new learning activities – working towards an effective pedagogical mix, combining resources, tools, student and tutor support. This paper describes CompendiumLD, a prototype tool we have built to support practitioners through the process of designing learning activities. We describe how the tool fits into our vision of a dynamic, interactive set of resources and system tools to support effective, efficient and creative learning design. It describes CompendiumLD's features and explains the rationale behind their development. It shows how the tool is intended to aid designers make choices, and plan developments, facilitating creativity and efficiency in the design process. In our conclusions we consider how such a system can support the design of effective learning activities.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item |
---|---|
Copyright Holders: | 2008 The Authors |
Keywords: | Learning design; CompendiumLD; learning activities; creativity |
Academic Unit/School: | Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET) Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Research Strategy & Operations |
Research Group: | Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET) |
Item ID: | 15783 |
Depositing User: | Andrew Brasher |
Date Deposited: | 21 Apr 2009 08:59 |
Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2018 13:22 |
URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/15783 |
Share this page: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.