The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Meetings between experts: a route to simpler, fairer trials?

Sommer, Peter (2009). Meetings between experts: a route to simpler, fairer trials? Digital Investigation, 5(3-4) pp. 146–152.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (70Kb)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2008.11.002
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Expert evidence which is both accurate and forensically sound can be daunting for a lay audience, particularly if opposing experts have points of disagreement. The current position in English law is examined to show the advantages and problems of pre-trial meetings between experts.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2008 Elsevier Ltd.
ISSN: 1742-2876
Keywords: expert evidence; court procedure; digital evidence; English criminal procedure rules; admissibility
Academic Unit/Department: Mathematics, Computing and Technology
Item ID: 15481
Depositing User: Colin Smith
Date Deposited: 27 Mar 2009 10:24
Last Modified: 29 Feb 2016 12:55
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/15481
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

► Automated document suggestions from open access sources

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk