The Open UniversitySkip to content

Academic use of digital resources: Disciplinary differences and the issue of progression revisited

Kemp, Bob and Jones, Chris (2007). Academic use of digital resources: Disciplinary differences and the issue of progression revisited. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 10(1) pp. 52–60.

Full text available as:
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (189kB)
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


This paper examines the use of digital resources by academic staff in a single UK University and its influence on academic practice over a two to three year period. The paper describes two linked studies that address several of the themes regarding the impact of electronic resources identified in this special edition. In particular it provides findings that contribute to our understanding of changing roles and practices in academic teaching (Oliver this edition). The themes explored in this paper include the way disciplinary differences affect the use of digital resources, and how academic progression is understood by academic staff in different disciplines and its role in informing staff choices in deploying digital resources for student use. The paper also addresses the issue of changing academic practice and the adoption life cycle in relation to use of digital resources.
Keywords: Digital resources, Disciplinary differences, Teaching and learning, Distributed learning environments.

Item Type: Journal Item
ISSN: 1436-4522
Keywords: Digital resources; Disciplinary differences; Teaching and learning; Distributed learning environments
Academic Unit/School: Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 15356
Depositing User: Chris Jones
Date Deposited: 16 Mar 2009 09:51
Last Modified: 02 May 2018 12:58
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU