The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Conceptualizing reproductive loss: a social sciences perspective

Earle, Sarah; Foley, Pam; Komaromy, Carol and Lloyd, Cathy E. (2008). Conceptualizing reproductive loss: a social sciences perspective. Human Fertility, 11(4) pp. 259–262.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (38kB)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270802298272
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper defines and explores reproductive loss and, drawing on a social sciences perspective, reflects on the lack of attention that has been given to the subject within the study of human fertility. The authors argue that whilst reproductive loss (broadly defined) is exceptionally common, scholars have – with some exceptions – focused on the study of reproductive ‘success’, and continue to do so. The paper examines the implications of this for policy, practice and the role of healthcare professionals and focuses on the significance of appreciating difference and diversity in the study of reproductive loss and the importance of placing such experiences within the social structure.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2008 British Fertility Society/Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
ISSN: 1464-7273
Keywords: human fertility; reproduction; pregnancy loss; reproductive loss; women's health; reproductive health; fertility; social concerns
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Health and Wellbeing PRA (Priority Research Area)
International Development & Inclusive Innovation
Item ID: 12610
Depositing User: Sarah Earle
Date Deposited: 12 Dec 2008 08:03
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2017 05:02
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/12610
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk