Traxler, John and Kukulska-Hulme, Agnes
(2006).
![[img]](http://oro.open.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF (Not Set)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (191kB) |
| URL: | http://www.alt.ac.uk/altc2006/altc2006_documents/r... |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
Mobile learning is at a leading edge of learning technologies and is at present characterised by pilots and trials that allow mobile technologies to be tested in a variety of learning contexts. The sustained deployment of mobile learning will depend on these pilots and trials, especially their evaluation methodology and reporting. The paper examines a sample of current evaluation practice, based on evidence drawn from conference proceedings, published case studies, and other accounts from the literature and draws on the authors' work in collecting case studies of mobile learning from a range of recent projects. The issues discussed include the apparent objectives of the documented pilots or trials, the nature of the evaluations, instruments and techniques used, and the presentation of findings. The paper reflects on the quality of evaluation in mobile learning pilots and trials, in the broader context of evolving practices in the evaluation of educational technologies.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item |
|---|---|
| Extra Information: | ISBN 0-9545870-5-7 |
| Keywords: | mobile learning; evaluation; |
| Academic Unit/School: | Learning Teaching and Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET) Learning Teaching and Innovation (LTI) |
| Interdisciplinary Research Centre: | Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET) |
| Item ID: | 12295 |
| Depositing User: | Agnes Kukulska-Hulme |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Nov 2008 10:40 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Feb 2017 23:47 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/12295 |
| Share this page: |     |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.