Piwek, Paul; Beun, Robbert-Jan and Cremers, Anita
This is the latest version of this eprint.
PDF (Not Set)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
In this paper we examine the differences in use between distal and proximal demonstrative terms (e.g., singular 'ï¿½thisï¿½' and 'ï¿½thatï¿½', and plural 'ï¿½theseï¿½' and 'ï¿½thoseï¿½' in English). The proximal–distal distinction appears to be made in all languages and therefore promises to be an important window on the cognitive mechanisms underlying language production and comprehension. We address the problem of accounting for the distinction through a corpus-based quantitative study of the deictic use of demonstratives in Dutch. Our study suggests that the distal–proximal distinction corresponds with use of the proximal for intensive/strong indicating (i.e., directing of attention) and the distal for neutral indicating. We compare our findings with empirical findings on the use of English demonstratives and argue that, despite some apparent differences, Dutch and English demonstratives behave roughly similarly though not identically. Finally, we put our findings into context by pulling together evidence from a number of converging sources on the relationship between indicating and describing as alternative modes of reference in the use of distal and proximal demonstratives. This will also lead us to a new understanding of the folk-view on distals and proximals as distinguishing between nearby and faraway objects.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Proximal and distal demonstratives; Accessibility; Importance; Deictic reference|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)|
|Depositing User:||Paul Piwek|
|Date Deposited:||30 Oct 2008 02:34|
|Last Modified:||04 Oct 2016 11:53|
|Share this page:|
Available Versions of this Item
'Proximal' and 'distal' in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch. (deposited 05 Jul 2007)
- 'Proximal' and 'distal' in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch. (deposited 30 Oct 2008 02:34) [Currently Displayed]
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.