The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Knowledge Cartography for Controversies: The Iraq Debate

Buckingham Shum, Simon and Okada, Alexandra (2008). Knowledge Cartography for Controversies: The Iraq Debate. In: Okada, Alexandra; Buckingham Shum, Simon J. and Sherborne, Tony eds. Knowledge Cartography: software tools and mapping techniques. Advanced Information and Knolwedge Processing, 1. Springer, pp. 249–265.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (924Kb)
URL: http://www.springer.com/computer/user+interfaces/b...
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In analysing controversies and debates—which would include reviewing a literature in order to plan research, or assessing intelligence to formulate policy—there is no one worldview which can be mapped, for instance as a single, coherent concept map. The cartographic challenge is to show which facts are agreed and contested, and the different kinds of narrative links that use facts as evidence to define the nature of the problem, what to do about it, and why. We will use the debate around the invasion of Iraq to demonstrate the methodology of using a knowledge mapping tool to extract key ideas from source materials, in order to classify and connect them within and across a set of perspectives of interest to the analyst. We reflect on the value that this approach adds, and how it relates to other argument mapping approaches.

Item Type: Book Chapter
ISBN: 1-84800-148-7, 978-1-84800-148-0
Academic Unit/Department: Knowledge Media Institute
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
Item ID: 11768
Depositing User: Alexandra Okada
Date Deposited: 06 Oct 2008 09:45
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2012 22:45
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/11768
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk