The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews

Lucas, Patricia J.; Baird, Janis; Arai, Lisa; Law, Catherine and Roberts, Helen M. (2007). Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(4)

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (264Kb)
URL: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcg...
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-4
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background
The inclusion of qualitative studies in systematic reviews poses methodological challenges. This paper presents worked examples of two methods of data synthesis (textual narrative and thematic), used in relation to one review, with the aim of enabling researchers to consider the strength of different approaches.

Methods
A systematic review of lay perspectives of infant size and growth was conducted, locating 19 studies (including both qualitative and quantitative). The data extracted from these were synthesised using both a textual narrative and a thematic synthesis.

Results
The processes of both methods are presented, showing a stepwise progression to the final synthesis. Both methods led us to similar conclusions about lay views toward infant size and growth. Differences between methods lie in the way they dealt with study quality and heterogeneity.

Conclusion
On the basis of the work reported here, we consider textual narrative and thematic synthesis have strengths and weaknesses in relation to different research questions. Thematic synthesis holds most potential for hypothesis generation, but may obscure heterogeneity and quality appraisal. Textual narrative synthesis is better able to describe the scope of existing research and account for the strength of evidence, but is less good at identifying commonality.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 1471-2288
Academic Unit/Department: Health and Social Care > Health and Social Care
Item ID: 11585
Depositing User: Lisa Arai
Date Deposited: 02 Sep 2008 05:13
Last Modified: 05 Dec 2010 06:39
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/11585
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk