Levidow, Les and Carr, Susan
(2007).
![[img]](http://oro.open.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF (Not Set)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (71kB) |
| DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: | https://doi.org/10.1068/c05123 |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
Since various crises of food safety in the European Union (EU), institutional reforms have been designed to regain public confidence in regulatory decisions and their expert basis. By Europeanising advisory expertise, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was also meant to help harmonise 'science-based regulation' and thus facilitate EU decisions. In evaluating agri-biotech products during 2003-2005, however, the EFSA procedure extended previous expert disagreements rather than overcome them. EFSA was designed to demonstrate that expert advice would be 'independent, objective and transparent�; yet tensions arose between expert experience versus independence, between transparency versus objectivity, and between harmonisation versus precaution. These conflicts have been shaped by the dominant problem-diagnosis, which favours a narrow expert consensus within a specific policy view. Alternative problem-diagnoses suggest that expertise should instead be pluralised, so that norms and uncertainties become more explicit. Pressure for EU reform manifests tensions between the dominant and alternative problem-diagnoses.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0263-774X |
| Keywords: | European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Union (EU); agri-biotech (genetically modified) products; regulatory harmonisation; precaution |
| Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Politics, Philosophy, Economics, Development, Geography Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) |
| Interdisciplinary Research Centre: | Innovation, Knowledge & Development research centre (IKD) International Development & Inclusive Innovation |
| Related URLs: |
|
| Item ID: | 10274 |
| Depositing User: | Les Levidow |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Jan 2008 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Feb 2017 16:23 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/10274 |
| Share this page: |     |
Altmetrics | Scopus Citations |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.